Salivary proteins rescue within-session suppression and conditioned avoidance in response to an intragastric quinine infusion.

A subset of salivary proteins (SPs) upregulates in response to a quinine-containing diet. The presence of these SPs then results in decreased bitter taste responding and taste nerve signaling. Bitter taste receptors in the oral cavity are also found in the stomach and intestines and contribute to behaviors that are influenced by post-oral signaling. It has been previously demonstrated that after several pairings of post-orally infused bitter stimuli and a neutral flavor, animals learn to avoid the flavor that was paired with gastric bitter, this is referred to as conditioned avoidance. Furthermore, animals will decrease licking of a neutral solution within a test session, when licking is paired with an intragastric bitter infusion; this has been described as within-session suppression. We used these paradigms to test the role of SPs in behaviors influenced by post-oral signaling. In both paradigms, the animal is given a test solution directly into the stomach (with or without quinine, and with or without SPs), and the infusions are self-administered by licking to a neutral solution (Kool-Aid). Quinine successfully conditioned a flavor avoidance, but, in a separate trial, we were unable to detect conditioning in the presence of SPs from donor animals. Likewise, quinine was able to suppress licking within the conditioned suppression paradigm, but the effect of the bitter was blocked in the presence of saliva containing SPs. Together, these data suggest that behaviors driven by post-oral signaling can be altered by SPs.

Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Sucralose avoiding rats detect a bitter-like taste quality in concentrations of sucralose that are strongly preferred over water by sucralose preferring rats. Here, we investigated whether sucralose preferrers (SP) also detect a bitter-like quality in sucralose that may be masked by an increased perception of sucralose's sweet-like quality. A microstructural analysis of sucralose intake revealed that, at concentrations they avoided in preference tests, sucralose avoiders (SA) consumed smaller and fewer bouts of sucralose than SP. Interestingly, the concentration-dependent increase in sucralose preference in SP was not associated with larger bouts or increased lick rate, two measures that are expected to increase with increasing perceived sweetness. This suggests that SP can detect an aversive quality in sucralose, but this perception of a presumably bitter-like quality may be masked by increased salience of a sweet-like quality that sustains high levels of intake in SP. Further evidence for increased sweet-taste perception in SP, relative to SA, was obtained in a second study in which SP consumed more of a palatable sweet-milk diet than SA. These are the first data to suggest that SP are not blind to the bitter-like quality in sucralose, and that there may be differences in sweet-taste perception between SP and SA.

Testing the diet-breadth trade-off hypothesis: differential regulation of novel plant secondary compounds by a specialist and a generalist herbivore.

Specialist herbivores are predicted to have evolved biotransformation pathways that can process large doses of secondary compounds from the plant species on which they specialize. It is hypothesized that this physiological specialization results in a trade-off such that specialists may be limited in ability to ingest novel plant secondary compounds (PSCs). In contrast, the generalist foraging strategy requires that herbivores alternate consumption of plant species and PSC types to reduce the possibility of over-ingestion of any particular PSC. The ability to behaviorally regulate is a key component of this strategy. These ideas underpin the prediction that in the face of novel PSCs, generalists should be better able to maintain body mass and avoid toxic consequences compared to specialists. We explored these predictions by comparing the feeding behavior of two herbivorous rodents: a juniper specialist, Neotoma stephensi, and a generalist, Neotoma albigula, fed diets with increasing concentrations of phenolic resin extracted from the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), which produces a suite of PSCs novel to both species. The specialist lost more mass than the generalist during the 15-day trial. In addition, although the specialist and generalist both regulated phenolic resin intake by reducing meal size while on the highest resin concentration (4%), the generalist began to regulate intake on the 2% diet. The ability of the generalist to regulate intake at a lower PSC concentration may be the source of the generalist's performance advantage over the specialist. These data provide evidence for the hypothesis that the specialist's foraging strategy may result in behavioral as well as physiological trade-offs in the ability to consume novel PSCs.

Effects of CCK-8 on independent ingestion and central c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in rats on postnatal days 10 and 11.

Controls of the independent ingestion of food in the preweanling rat emerge in the second postnatal week. We investigated the effects of CCK-8 (0, 1, 5, or 10 microg/kg IP) on intake and c-Fos-like immunoreactive (CFLI) cells in hindbrain and forebrain on postnatal days 10 and 11. Five micrograms per kilogram decreased intake and increased the number of CFLI cells in four subnuclei of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), in arcuate nucleus (ARC), and in central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). Ten micrograms per kilogram decreased intake and increased CFLI in three NTS subnuclei as much as 5 microg/kg did, but was more potent than 5 microg/kg in the medial NTS subnucleus. Ten micrograms per kilogram increased CFLI in paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei, but 5 microg/kg did not. Thus, reduction of intake by CCK-8 on days 10 and 11 is associated with increased hindbrain and forebrain CFLI.

Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake.

Although central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) has a potent orexic effect, it is not clear how NPY changes the potency of peripheral feedbacks from the gut to prolong eating and increase meal size. It has been suggested that NPY increases the stimulating effect of orosensory sweet stimuli or that it decreases the inhibitory effect of postingestive stimuli. To clarify this issue, we compared the orexic effect of NPY (2 microg) injected into the third ventricle of the brain on the volume and microstructure of intake of 0.8M sucrose during sham feeding (SF) and real feeding (RF) in male Sprague Dawley rats. The rationale for this comparison is that orosensory stimulation occurs in SF and RF, but postingestive negative feedback is present only in RF. NPY increased the volume ingested and the rate and number of clusters of licking significantly more in SF than in RF. This demonstrates that orosensory sucrose stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for the orexic effect of NPY under these experimental conditions.